![]() ![]() we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.Īs an example, one rating criteria for lipsticks is luster. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. Without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. ![]() we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. On the feathering category the current five indicates considering the question "how feathering is this product?" primarily indicate stays put.Īt blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. Considering the buildable category an average total of four suggests in response to the "how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product?" generally suggest builds easily. Looking at review rankings for the pigmentation category a rating of five is a sign that replies to "how pigmented is this product?" mainly favor opaque. Feedback for the colour category the rating of five suggests users & critics evaluating "does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?" usually indicate true to colour. Reviewing the application category an average of four suggests reviewers when asked "how did this product apply?" usually favor glides. Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |